| Assessment | Institutional Research | Fast Facts | Fact Book |
Academic Assessment Guidelines |
||||
| |
Use the links below to access individual sections of the guidelines or download the entire document as a pdf by clicking here. |
|||
|
|
||||
| Statement of Purpose | ||||
|
The Morningside College mission emphasizes the importance of life-long learning as a central component of the Morningside Experience. Through assessment, the College community engages in a reflective learning process for the purpose of improving institutional effectiveness and demonstrates its desire to provide quality programs and services.
Colleges do not exist to provide instruction but to produce learning. The most critical component of an college's assessment program is academic assessment. At Morningside College academic assessment is defined as the systematic and ongoing process used by faculty and students to gather, analyze and use information to improve student learning. (See " A Glossary of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness Terms " for additional definitions.) |
||||
| Return to top | ||||
| |
||||
| Assessment Principles | ||||
| 1. Assessment will be guided by the Morningside College mission and vision statements.
2. The purpose of academic assessment is to improve educational experiences of Morningside College students.
3. Assessment of student learning and development will be a collaborative process involving faculty, students and staff. It should provide academic programs, and the academic community as a whole, with opportunities to investigate and reflect upon important questions about student learning.
4. Responsibility for the assessment of student learning experiences rest with the faculty.
5. Each academic program will maintain a three-year assessment plan and report on assessment results on an annual basis.
6. Assessment results should be used to support curricular, planning, and budgeting decision making processes.
7. While student learning outcomes assessment is an important component of the assessment program, input and process assessments must also be considered if assessment is to have a formative effect. This relationship is illustrated in the conceptual Input-Environment/Experience-Outcome (IEO) included at the end of this document.
8. To effectively improve student learning, information gathered through the assessment process must be combined with knowledge of pedagogy and human learning theory.
9. Morningside's assessment plan shall be evaluated on an annual basis and a report provided to the Dean of the College/VPAA.
10. Assessment results will not be used for faculty or staff evaluation. |
||||
| Return to top | ||||
| |
||||
| Assessment Ethics | ||||
| 1.
Treat information collected through assessment activities confidentially.
No information should be released publicly in such a way as to permit identification
of individuals. In general, information based on samples/cells of three
or less students should not be reported.
2. Accurately report assessment results including strengths and areas for improvement as well as limitations of the assessment methodology.
3. Use sound methodology.
4. Explain the purpose of assessment activities to participants and how results will be used.
5. Honor all promises of reports, feedback and rewards. 6. To the extent possible, participation in assessment activities should be voluntary |
||||
| Return to top | ||||
| |
||||
| Responsibilities | ||||
| The
roles and responsibilities of the primary groups and individuals involved
in academic assessment are outlined below. Figure
1 provides a graphical depiction of the relationships between these
groups.
Faculty
Curriculum Policies Committee (CPC)
Students
Department Chairs
Office of Assessment & Institutional Research (OAIR)
Dean of College/Vice President of Academic Affairs (DOC/VPAA)
|
||||
| Return to top | ||||
| |
||||
| Levels of Assessment | ||||
Academic assessment occurs at a variety of levels within the Morningside curriculum and is related to the level of the student learning outcomes the assessment is intended to address. The relationship between the levels of academic assessment and student learning outcomes is depicted in Figure 2.
Institutional Assessment
Morningside College engages in a number of assessment activities at the institutional level. These include entry, environment/experience, and outcomes assessments. The focus of the institutional assessment activities is based on the Morningside mission, vision, goal and eight student learning outcomes. Due to the existence of the eight Morningside student learning outcomes, general education assessment can be considered to be institutional in scope.
The institutional assessment program relies on information gathered centrally through the Office of Assessment & Institutional Research and locally through the academic programs and specific offices. The goal of centralizing some of the assessment efforts is to avoid redundancy, reduce overall workload, and to capitalize on available information sources. The Academic Assessment Plan includes a table showing the annual cycle of institution-wide assessment data collection activities.
Academic Program Assessment
Each academic program has a purpose and a set of student learning outcomes. Some of the outcomes are related to the program's link to the eight Morningside student-learning outcomes; others are based on specific learning outcomes unique to the academic program. Programs may also be concerned about collecting information about students at the point of entry into the program as well as the experiences and activities of students while they are in the program.
Course Assessment
Faculty may engage in course level assessment for a number of reasons. Assessment plans developed at the institutional or program level may include assessments that are embedded within a particular course. Course level assessment activities, such as course-embedded assessments, may serve a dual role if components are also used as part of the faculty member's process for assigning student grades. Capstone courses, for example, are often designed to include assessments used both in determining student grades for the course and for providing information for an institutional or program assessment plan. An instructor may also engage in course assessment as part of a course improvement effort or research project.
At Morningside College , courses included within the Distribution and Flags are required to engage in course-embedded assessment activities and sends a results report to the CPC. This information will be used both to determine the extent to which students are achieving the student learning outcomes associated within the distribution. It is also likely that the information will also be used within the institutional plan for assessing student achievement of the eight Morningside learning outcomes.
Classroom Assessment Classroom assessment techniques (CATs) are voluntarily used by faculty as part of an instructional improvement process and for monitoring student learning. In general, it is difficult to utilize information gathered through the use of CATs at the program or institutional level. However, widespread use of CAT-generated information for instructional improvement should be considered evidence of an institution's learner-centered focus. It also indicates concern about the continued improvement of instructional methods and engagement in scholarly research. |
||||
| Return to top | ||||
| |
||||
| Academic Assessment Process | ||||
The academic assessment process is consistent across the levels. Figure 3 provides a model of the process. Steps in the process include: 1. Identification of purpose and goals 2. Identification of student learning objectives/outcomes 3. Identification of the student learning activities that lead to the achievement of the objectives/outcomes 4. Determination of the assessment methods for measuring the level of achievement of the objectives/outcomes 5. Identification of the expected levels of performance for each assessment method 6. Implementation of the learning and assessment activities 7. Gathering of data 8. Analysis and interpretation of the evidence 9. Identification of strengths and areas for improvement 10. Identification and implementation of changes for improvement 11. Reiteration of the assessment process
|
||||
| Return to top | ||||
| |
||||